To first open the directory for browsing, there is a significant delay with both programs. In contrast, the images open instantly with ACDSee regardless of the directory size. In a directory with 26,529 files, it takes more than 47 sec to open the same image! As reported before, XnView uses ~50% of CPU resources during file opening. It takes more than 10 sec to open a single image (e.g. However, I if put the same image files together with other image files in a single large directory, XnView becomes really slow when browsing the files. If I place a few image files in a single directory, both ACDSee and XnView open the files within fractions of a second. It turns out that the large performance difference between ACDSEe and XnView is not so much due to differences in rendering but due to differences in file handling!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |